After studying the effects of the dark current, dark-current shot noise and the dark fixed-pattern noise on the Photon Transfer Curve (PTC), the influence of the temperature will be studied in this blog. The dark current is strongly depending on the temperature. From literature it can be learned that the dark current can double for every 5oC … 8oC temperature increase. Because the dark-current shot noise is related to the dark current (square-root relation), the shot noise component itself is becoming temperature dependent as well. And the same is true for the dark fixed-pattern noise, at least, if the fixed-pattern noise is generated by non-uniformities in the leakage current. All three components studied so far depend on the temperature. Then the interesting question can be raised : “What will be the influence of the temperature on the PTC ?”.
As was the case in the previous blogs, 100+ dark images were generated at various exposure times (between 0 s and 65 s), and in this particular case, also at two different temperatures : 30oC and 60oC. The result of this exercise in dark can be seen in the following four figures :
- Figure 1 contains the average dark signal (left axis) of the generated images and its noise component (right axis) as a function of the integration time (horizontal axis), for images generated at the two temperatures indicated. To find the noise, all images were averaged on pixel level and the standard deviation on the resulting image was calculated. This allows obtaining the FPN, because the calculation is done on the averaged pixel signals and consequently, the temporal noise component is excluded (or at least strongly reduced).
- Figure 2 shows the dark fixed-pattern noise versus the dark signal, based on the data shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 is very similar to the Photon Transfer Curve, keeping in mind that this time the FPN is shown. As can be seen the temperature has no influence on this PTC curve.
- Figure 3 contains the average dark signal (left axis) of the generated images and its temporal noise component (right axis) as a function of the integration time (horizontal axis), for images generated at the two temperatures indicated. To find the noise, the standard deviation for the various pixels was calculated, and afterwards these values were averaged. This allows obtaining the temporal noise, because the calculation is done on the individual pixel values and consequently, the fixed-pattern noise component is excluded.
- Figure 4 shows the dark temporal noise versus the dark signal, based on the data shown in Figure 3. The same conclusion as for Figure 2 is valid : the temperature has no influence on the PTC curve.

Figure 1 : Dark current and its FPN component as a function of the exposure time, for two different temperatures.
As can be seen in Figure 1, the average dark signal is linear with the integration time, indicating that the dark current is responsible for the signal in dark. The relation between the dark signal and the exposure time (texp expressed in ms !) is also indicated in Figure 1. The FPN as a function of exposure time is shown on the right axis. Because the FPN is composed only out of dark current non-uniformities, the relation between the FPN and the exposure time is linear as well. The empirical relationship is shown in Figure 1 (texp expressed in ms). From the two formulas shown, it can be deduced that the FPN component is 1/6.6 or 15.2 % of the dark signal. And this number is valid at any given temperature, because in the sensor under study, FPN is generated only by the dark current.

Figure 2 : Dark FPN versus dark signal for two different temperatures.
The corresponding “PTC” curve is illustrated in Figure 2 : the FPN versus the dark signal is shown. Notice that the temperature has no effect on the curve. The slope of the curve should be equal to 1, and its intersection with the horizontal axis is defined by the ratio of the FPN to the average dark current. Both parameters are not influenced by the temperature.

Figure 3 : Dark current and its temporal noise component as a function of the exposure time, for two different temperatures.

Figure 4 : “PTC” of the sensor with only dark current shot noise for two different temperatures.
Figures 3 and 4 are showing the dark signal with its temporal noise component, being the dark shot noise. Clearly visible is the strong influence of the temperature on the dark current, as well as on the dark-current shot noise, both shown in Figure 3. But similar to Figure 2, the PTC curve shown in Figure 4 is not influenced by the temperature. This can be easily explained : its slope should be equal to 0.5, and the crossing with the horizontal axis is defining the conversion gain of the system. The latter is not influenced by the temperature !
From Figure 2 as well as from Figure 4, it can be calculated that the dark current is increased by a factor of 882/66 = 13.36 when switching from 30oC to 60oC. This corresponds to a doubling of the dark current for a temperature increase of 8.2oC.
Conclusion : the temperature has a strong influence on the dark-current, on the dark-current shot noise and on the dark current FPN. On the contrary, if these three parameters are taken into account, the temperature does not influence the PTC curve. So, it does not matter at which temperature the data is taken to generate a PTC curve. The various data point on the curve can even be generated at different temperatures. But important to realize : all images generated to create a single data point on the PTC curve should be taken at the same temperature !
Next time, the model of the sensor will be extended by the incorporation of anti-blooming in the pixels as well as anti-blooming non-uniformities.
Albert 2009-09-24